Many healthcare companies are in the market offering to organise and assist patients who have decided to “go private� for their procedures – either as a first choice or because surgery is simply not available to them under the national health scheme.
Most prospective patients, certainly in the UK and Republic of Ireland, arrange their private treatment through commercial providers and/or facilitators, rather than attempting to deal direct with the surgeon, and many providers offer a range of procedures, from Cosmetic Surgery, Dental Treatment or Laser Eye Surgery to Obesity Surgery and General Surgery.
It can be quite bewildering for the prospective patient who must not only attempt to learn as much as possible about the procedure they wish to undergo, but also try to select a surgeon and medical team they are willing to put their trust in, and to choose a company which will inform and guide them honestly and put the patient’s best interests above their own desire to “make a sale�.
Michael Dermody and Deborah Darling of Cosmetic Bliss – a private healthcare company which arranges weight loss surgery and post-weight loss cosmetic surgery in the Czech Republic for English-speaking patients are calling for better standards of clear communication and improved support by healthcare facilitators for their patients – especially in the field of weight loss surgery , their own specialist area.
Michael Dermody is quoted as saying
“Our company’s high reputation on the various weight loss forums is founded on our being able to provide thorough and extensive information to our patients pre-operatively, ensuring that they are properly prepared for their surgery; supporting them whilst they make the visit for the surgical procedure and being available to them during the period of weight loss after their surgery.
I think what makes us special is the “hand-holding� service we give whilst the patient is with us for surgery. We make sure we are there – in the hospital – with them throughout their stay, and this is something our patients really value above everything else. Of course we couldn’t do it without the co-operation we get from our partner hospital and surgeon.
We realised a long time ago that taking patients through weight loss surgery was very different from arranging Cosmetic Surgery – it is much more demanding, and requires a much greater commitment by the provider
Firstly, there is the matter of assessing the patient’s suitability for surgery. Quite apart from fairly rigorous pre-operative preparation and testing, some of which should be done well before the surgery itself, there is the issue of making sure the patient is really ready for surgery and prepared to make the mental adjustments, in terms of relationship to food which are necessary if the surgery is to achieve long-term weight loss. Then there is the question of putting in place for the patient an adequate system of support and monitoring during the months and years after the surgery. Unless all these things are done, and done correctly, there’s every chance a patient is wasting their money in having the surgery, as the whole point of the exercise is for the patient to achieve sustained, long term weight loss, not merely a good safe operation with clean scars!
It disheartens and worries me when I see that there are still some companies out there that sell weight loss surgery in a way I would expect to see furniture sold, with “special offer� discounts, and “last minute deals�. It all seems to diminish the serious nature of the surgery and the commitment the patient has to make. More alarming, though, is the lack of quality information provided by some companies – and in some cases positively inaccurate and misleading information is openly advertised on websites. There are still providers of weight loss procedures who advertise a Gastric Bands as being “the same as Gastric Bypass�, and even one promoting Intragastric balloons (a non-surgical temporary endoscopic procedure) as “Lap Bands� .
That’s no different from selling someone a cat, and telling them it’s a dog, on the grounds that “it’s the same thing�!
I know that many companies do a good job, but it is not fair or right to expect the enquiring prospective patient to be able to distinguish between accurate and misleading or inadequate information – especially as they often come to the marketplace having done very little research before contacting providers.
I firmly believe that there is a crying need for Private Healthcare providers and Medical Tourism companies to get together – probably in the form of a trade organisation - to set agreed standards of care, support and accuracy of information, and devise a form of accreditation – not only for the sake of their own reputations but in the interests of true patient care.
Our own facilities in Breclav Hospital are specifically geared to Obesity Surgery, and there are emergency and ICU departments on hand at this modern major hospital to enable us to safely cater for those morbidly obese patients who have other serious health problems. We are working closely with the hospital and Dr Michal Cierny PhD, the Specialist Bariatric Surgeon in charge of the Bariatric and Metabolic Centre there in creating a European Centre of Excellence in Bariatric Surgery.
We are currently actively seeking to co-operate with other providers and facilitators of Private Healthcare - especially in the UK, Eire, and North America - who have a close and trusting relationship with their patients and who share our own commitment to the quality of information and pre- and post-operative care standards for Bariatric patients I have described.
We are willing to develop working relationships with companies who wish to take full advantage of our facilities for safe surgery, and who will value the round the clock support we will be able to provide to their patients when they are with us for surgery. This will enable the provider to focus on putting in place a solid system of pre-and post operative support, and we would welcome enquiries from other Private Healthcare companies working in this field who are interested in developing such a relationship, and promoting standards of excellence in the area of Obesity Surgery and care and support in managing weight loss post-surgery.
We would welcome enquiries from Healthcare Providers and Facilitators, initial contact can be made with us through our website: http://www.cosmeticbliss.co.uk/p/contact

Despite the yearly rise in the numbers classified as “Morbidly Obese” in the UK, and the drain on public health resources due to the costs of treating chronic illnesses which are caused by this epidemic of obesity, the provision of Surgery as an option for patients is still very scant in most areas of the UK. An article in the Scotsman on 27/12/2009 stated that only 0.8% of Scots eligible and willing to go ahead with Obesity Surgery receive it. In England the situation is marginally better – 1.2%!!
When NICE (The National Institute for Clinical Excellence) issued Guideline 43 in December 2006, it clearly stated who should be considered for surgery – patients with a BMI of over 40 (or over 35 with obesity-related “co-morbidities�) who have exhausted attempts to maintain weight loss through more conventional methods. The guidelines also recommend Surgery as a “first line option� for patients with a BMI of over 50.
In Jan 2008 BOSPA (the British Obesity Surgery Patients’ Association) published a survey of the attitude of PCTs – those bodies in the UK who are responsible for allocating funding for surgery. Many did not respond, but of those who did around half confirmed they applied much stricter criteria when approving funding of surgery than the NICE guidelines. There remains no clinical justification whatever for denying surgery to patients who meet the NICE guidelines – so the practice of insisting on much more severe criteria before allowing surgery is clearly based on limiting cost. Local PCTs clearly have a finite budget with many competing demands, and Obesity surgery is potentially a great drain on their resources. The NICE guidelines are, after all, only guidelines and are not legally enforceable – though some patients have sought legal redress for the failure of their PCTs to adequately deal with their health problem.
It seems a very short-sighted approach, in terms of the PCTs duty to provide adequate healthcare, condemning obese patients to become more ill as the obesity-related diseases develop, and even from the cost point of view studies have shown that Obesity Surgery pays for itself over approx. 3 years, as the cost burden of treating co-morbidities such as Type II Diabetes is reduced in patients who have lost significant weight. The government makes little provision for tackling this epidemic, and largely leaves PCTs to “get on with it as best they can�
So, what can someone who is classified as Morbidly Obese, and needs surgery do?
It is possible to attempt to put pressure on your local PCT through your GP to approve surgery, but it is a long uphill battle, with very little prospect of success.
You can look for surgery privately, which is the course most obese patients follow.
There are problems and pitfalls here, quite apart from the cost you will have to meet.
Firstly you have to be careful to choose a surgeon, hospital/clinic and company, (if you arrange your surgery through a Healthcare company as most do) who are not only experienced in the type of surgery which will be best for you, but also you must be sure that all the pre-operative health checks and tests are at least as extensive as in the NHS. It goes without saying that every effort should be made to ensure your surgery is as safe as possible. Psychological evaluation and some counselling to ensure a patient is at the right point to be able to succeed with weight loss following surgery is absolutely vital. NICE recommends that obesity should be managed by a multi-disciplinary team, and that post-operative support is essential
Post-operative support – whatever the surgery - is very important and you should be careful to chose a surgery provider who is willing to offer this, and not simply prepared to leave it to your GP to give advice and help after the surgery.
Cosmetic Bliss http://www.cosmeticbliss.co.uk/p/weight-loss-surgery is a weight loss surgery company who arrange safe Obesity Surgery for English-speaking patients at the Bariatric and Metabolic Centre – Breclav Hospital in the Czech Republic with Dr Michal Cierny PhD the Bariatric surgeon. They have a great deal of experience in preparing patients and giving them sufficient information to ensure safe surgery. The hospital is working to become a European Centre of Excellence in Bariatric Surgery, and the pre-operative health checks and tests for patients are very extensive. Cosmetic Bliss accompany all patients throughout their stay at the hospital and provide a full system of post operative support, nutrition diet and exercise advice. They encourage regular post-operative contact and follow up with patients for a minimum of 2 years after surgery, and monitor post-operative outcomes and weight loss following surgery on behalf of Dr Cierny. They are keen to work with UK GPs in providing post operative support to all patients. Although initially many patients are a little intimidated by the prospect of having surgery abroad, the quality of care, the system of safeguards Cosmetic Bliss and the Hospital have put in place, and the hand-holding service Cosmetic Bliss provide whilst the patient is in Hospital make it a very reassuring experience. Prices are fully inclusive and the cost is significantly lower than arranging for surgery in the UK also.

David Rose  The Times July 9, 2007 
A hospital that is failing to tackle superbug infections has been served with an official warning in the first case of its kind, the health watchdog will announce today.

Inspectors from the Healthcare Commission have found Chase Farm Hospital in Enfield, North London, to be in “serious breach� of the Hygiene Code, the latest government rules to manage healthcare-associated infections such as MRSA and C. difficile.

Even basic requirements, such as providing hand-washing gels at a patient’s bedside, were not in place, the watchdog said.

By Bruno Waterfield and Nic Fleming - Daily Telegraph 7/6/07
British hospitals are among the worst in Europe for superbugs, according to figures published yesterday.
In a league table of 29 countries only Portugal, Malta, Cyprus and Romania have higher proportions of potentially deadly antibiotic-resistant hospital-acquired infections.
Only some forms of superbugs are resistant to antibiotics - including those known as MRSA. They are part of the staphylococcus aureus family of bacteria that can live on the skin or in the nose and can cause a range of illnesses and symptoms from boils and abscesses to life-threatening diseases such as meningitis and septicaemia.
The bacteria become dangerous to patients once they enter the bloodstream and those that are resistant to antibiotics pose the greatest threat.
The European Union’s Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) report on communicable diseases ranked countries based on the proportion of S aureus infections found to be antibiotic-resistant.
With an MRSA rate of 44 per cent, Britain was found to be the fifth worst for superbug resistance, behind countries including Greece, Slovakia, Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic.
The ECDC study compiled data showing the trend in superbug antibiotic resistance in recent years for each country.
The amount of MRSA as a proportion of all staphylococcus aureus infections in British hospitals was unchanged between 2002 and 2005.
In contrast it fell in other countries including Slovakia, Greece and in France.Doctors fear the spread of resistance to antibiotics could lead to problems in treating other illnesses such as pneumonia.
The ECDC says the spread of hospital-acquired infections is now the main disease threat in Europe, despite continuing concerns over tuberculosis and HIV.
The report states: “If the present rapid negative development is not halted, mankind will soon lose one of its most important weapons against infectious diseases.
“The most important threat in Europe is posed by micro-organisms that have become resistant to antibiotics.”
Figures released by the Office of National Statistics in February showed the number of death certificates in England and Wales that mentioned MRSA rose 39 per cent to 1,629 between 2004 and 2005.
This is widely seen as an underestimate because other causes are often listed when MRSA could have contributed to or been the primary cause deaths. Health officials privately concede they are unlikely to hit the Government target of halving the number of MRSA cases by April.
Andrew Lansley, the shadow health secretary, said: “With 7,000 nursing posts and 9,000 beds lost in the last year, it is little wonder that we are amongst the worst countries in Europe for rates of MRSA infections.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/06/08/nmrsa108.xml